Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

CETIM focuses on the promotion and implementation of economic, social and cultural rights (ESCR). They are the backbone of human rights and a powerful tool for achieving a self determinated development model by peoples. This is particularly true for the most vulnerable and marginalised populations. Properly implemented, these rights contribute to the respect for human dignity and to the achievement of social justice. On the contrary, the violation of any of them can jeopardise the enjoyment of all the others.

The universality, indivisibility and interdependence of human rights are enshrined in international instruments. Yet, we are still a long way from their effective implementation for all, and ESCR are among the worst off. Indeed, the basic needs (food, water, health, housing, education) of a third of humanity are still not being met. In some respects, the situation has even deteriorated, including in the countries of the North. This is due to the fact that the policies adopted at economic level accentuate ESCR violations and cause
– increased poverty
– growing inequality across the world
– multiple crises (political, economic, financial, environmental, social and cultural).

By definition, human rights are designed to protect citizens from the arbitrary actions of the most powerful and their governments

The international health crisis linked to COVID-19 has only exacerbated this situation. It has also shown the importance of implementing public policies based on ESCR. In particular, the right to health, the right to housing, the right to food, the right to water, the right to work, the right to education and the right to social security.

But for human rights to be better respected, they must be known, they must be demanded and they must be enforced. However, victims are often unaware of their rights and of the mechanisms available to them for appealing (at national, regional or international level). States, which have an obligation to inform and educate their citizens about human rights, often fail in their duties.

The role played by civil society organisations and social movements in human rights education and training is therefore crucial
– to denounce human rights violations
– to contribute to the implementation of existing standards.

The situation in Iraq, since the recent invasion, is characterized by an accumulation of human rights violations, without precedent, since the end of the second world war

HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION 61st session 14 March – 22 April 2005 Read the CETIM oral statement I. THE AGGRESSION The invasion of Iraq, under the false pretext that the regime in place possessed weapons of massive destruction, was a crime of aggression and a crime against peace1. II. WAR CRIMES Acts of war committed during […]

Continue reading

Fighting poverty: alibi of the globalizers

COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS 61st session 14 March – 22 April 2005 Read the CETIM’s written statement 1. In 1980, the World Bank estimated that there were 800 million people living in absolute poverty in the developing world. In its first big report on poverty in 1990, its estimate of the number of people in […]

Continue reading

Comments on Parts I and II of the ICESCR

COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Working Group to consider options regarding the elaboration of a draft optional protocol to the ICESCR 10 January – 21 January 2005 [Extract from the declaration] However, this right is more relevant than ever if we take into account the fact that the sovereignty of many States over their natural wealth […]

Continue reading

The right do development in a globalized world

A. WHAT IS THE RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT? I. Development 1) Development must be a global process with mankind as its main focus and with the achievement of mankind’s personal potential (physical, intellectual, moral and cultural) within the community as its main aim; 2) The aforementioned process requires the active and conscious participation of individuals and […]

Continue reading

Comments to the Draft optional Protocol to the ICESCR

A. The capacity of the States to submit communications 1. In paragraph 14 of the document (E/CN.4/1997/105), the Committee reports that it has decided not to recommend the inclusion of an inter-State complaints procedure within the proposed optional protocol. 2. Excluding this procedure without valid reasons is counter to the approach taken in the International […]

Continue reading
1 33 34 35 36 37 45